US Judge Blocks Trump’s Deployment of Oregon National Guard to Portland for Now
A federal judge in Oregon has halted President Donald Trump’s plan to deploy National Guard troops to Portland. The ruling was issued on October 4, 2025. It reflects ongoing disputes over federal authority in local affairs.
Portland’s Protest Situation
Portland has experienced small protests near the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building. These gatherings involve only a few dozen people nightly. They occur in a one-block area in a city of over 600,000 residents.
Local police manage issues like vandalism effectively. On October 4, a peaceful march drew thousands downtown with no arrests. Later, about 400 protesters reached the ICE facility. Federal agents used tear gas and arrested six individuals.
Oregon officials describe the situation as calm. They dispute Trump’s claim that Portland is “war-ravaged.” Protests slightly increased after the deployment announcement on September 28.
Trump’s Deployment Order
President Trump ordered 200 Oregon National Guard members to Portland. His goal was to protect federal buildings from unrest. This decision placed state troops under federal control.
The White House cited attacks on law enforcement as justification. However, Oregon and Portland officials quickly filed a lawsuit. They argued the move violated state rights.
US Judge Blocks Trump’s Deployment of Oregon National Guard to Portland for Now
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut issued a temporary order. It stops the deployment for at least 14 days. The ruling supports the state’s legal challenge.
The judge noted that protests are small and mostly peaceful. Local forces can handle them adequately. Trump’s decision lacked sufficient evidence to justify federal intervention.
Immergut emphasized the U.S. tradition against military involvement in civilian matters. “This is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law,” she wrote. The order upholds Oregon’s authority over its National Guard, aligning with the Tenth Amendment.
Responses from Both Sides
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield welcomed the decision. He called it a check on presidential overreach. “Portland is not ravaged. There is no rebellion,” Rayfield stated.
He stressed that the National Guard should not be used for “political theater.” State leaders expressed relief at the temporary block.
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson defended the deployment. She said Trump acted within his legal authority to protect federal assets. The administration expects to win on appeal and filed with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court on October 4.
Past Portland Conflicts
This is not Portland’s first federal clash. In 2020, Trump sent federal agents during racial justice protests. They protected a courthouse amid unrest following George Floyd’s death.
Those actions led to lawsuits and clashes. The government settled a case this year over injuries from excessive force. A report found agents were inadequately trained at the time.
Broader National Guard Deployments
Trump has considered deploying troops to other Democrat-led cities. These include Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago, and Memphis. Last month, a judge ruled his Los Angeles deployment unlawful.
About 300 troops remain there under restrictions. An appeal has paused that block. Trump also authorized Guard use in Chicago recently, citing urban unrest.
Looking Ahead
The temporary block remains until further court discussions. The 9th Circuit will review the appeal soon. Both sides are preparing their arguments.
This case tests the limits of federal control over state militias. Its outcome could influence future deployments. Portland remains vigilant as the legal battle continues.
US judge blocks Trump’s deployment of Oregon National Guard to Portland for now. The decision calms local concerns, but appeals may alter the outcome.
Read More : Piers Morgan Reacts to Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez’s Lavish Wedding
